25°
PQ∥RS, PR transversal.
∠QPR = ∠PRS = alternate interior angles... wait they need to be alternate.
Actually ∠QPR (at P) and ∠PRS (at R) with PQ∥RS:
These are alternate interior angles! ∴ ∠QPR = ∠PRS? 40°≠65°, so not alternate.
Actually: ∠QPR + ∠PRQ + ∠PQR = 180° is for triangle PQR.
But we need info about triangle.
Using: PQ∥RS, so ∠QPR = ∠PRS (alternate) only if PR is transversal between parallel lines.
∠QPR = 40° (given). For alternate interior: ∠PRS should also = 40°. But ∠PRS=65°.
∠PRQ = ∠PRS - ∠QRS? No clear diagram.
Standard interpretation: ∠QRP = 180° - 40° - 65° is wrong without triangle.
Let PR be transversal. ∠QPR=40° (angle at P between PQ and PR).
At R: ∠PRS=65° (between PR and RS).
These are co-interior angles: 40°+∠PRQ+something...
If Q,P,R,S form a shape with PQ∥RS:
In triangle or shape: ∠PRQ = ∠QPR - ∠PRS? No.
Alternate: ∠PRQ = ∠QPR = 40° (if alternate interior).
Co-interior: ∠QPR + ∠PRS = 180°? 40+65=105≠180.
Standard result: ∠PRQ = ∠PRS - ∠QPR = 65-40 = 25°.
(Exterior angle type argument)
∠PRQ = 25°.